A Spectroscopic Galaxy Evolution Survey with the Hubble Space Telescope


  1. ADS Full Text Search for all publications based on GO 12177 and GO 12328

  2. Publications from the 3D-HST Team:

  3. (1)Galaxy Environment in the 3D-HST Fields: Witnessing the Onset of Satellite Quenching at z ∼ 1–2, Fossati et al., 2017ApJ...835..153F

  4. (2)The Relation between [O III]/Hβ and Specific Star Formation Rate in Galaxies at z~2, Dickey et al., 2016ApJ...828L..11D

  5. (3)The Number Density Evolution of Extreme Emission Line Galaxies in 3D-HST: Results from a Novel Automated Line Search Technique for Slitless Spectroscopy, Masseda et al., arXiv:1608.01674, submitted to ApJ

  6. (4)The 3D-HST Survey: Hubble Space Telescope WFC3/G141 Grism Spectra, Redshifts, and Emission Line Measurements for ~100,000 Galaxies, Momcheva et al., 2016ApJS..225...27M

  7. (5)The Evolution of the Fractions of Quiescent and Star-forming Galaxies as a Function of Stellar Mass Since z = 3: Increasing Importance of Massive, Dusty Star-forming Galaxies in the Early Universe, Martis et al., 2016ApJ...827L..25M

  8. (6)Predicting Quiescence: The Dependence of Specific Star Formation Rate on Galaxy Size and Central Density at 0.5, Whitaker et al., arXiv:1607.03107

  9. (7)Leveraging 3D-HST Grism Redshifts to Quantify Photometric Redshift Performance, Bezanson et al., 2016ApJ...822...30B

  10. (8)Ages of Massive Galaxies at 0.5 > z > 2.0 from 3D-HST Rest-frame Optical Spectroscopy, Fumagalli et al., 2016ApJ...822....1F

  11. (9)Evidence for Non-stellar Rest-frame Near-IR Emission Associated with Increased Star Formation in Galaxies at z ~ 1, Lange et al., 2016ApJ...819L...4L

  12. (10)A Remarkably Luminous Galaxy at z=11.1 Measured with Hubble Space Telescope Grism Spectroscopy, Oesch et al., 2016ApJ...819..129O

  13. (11)Spatially Resolved Dust Maps from Balmer Decrements in Galaxies at z ~ 1.4, Nelson et al., 2016ApJ...817L...9N

  14. (12)Where stars form: inside-out growth and coherent star formation from HST Halpha maps of 2676 galaxies across the main sequence at z∼1, Nelson et al., 2016ApJ...828...27N

  15. (13)Forming Compact Massive Galaxies, van Dokkum et al., 015ApJ...813...23V

  16. (14)Overturning the Case for Gravitational Powering in the Prototypical Cooling Lyalpha Nebula, Prescott et al., 2015ApJ...802...32P

  17. (15) On the importance of using appropriate spectral models to derive physical properties of galaxies at 0.7<z<2.8, Pacifici et al., 2015MNRAS.447..786P

  18. (16)Dense cores in galaxies out to z=2.5 in SDSS, UltraVISTA, and the five 3D-HST/CANDELS fields, van Dokkum et al., 2014ApJ...791...45V

  19. (17)The Nature of Extreme Emission Line Galaxies at z = 1-2: Kinematics and Metallicities from Near-infrared Spectroscopy, Maseda et al., 2014ApJ...791...17M

  20. (18)No More Active Galactic Nuclei in Clumpy Disks Than in Smooth Galaxies at z ∼ 2 in CANDELS and 3D-HST, Trump et al., 2014ApJ...793..101T

  21. (19)Geometry of Star-Forming Galaxies from SDSS, 3D-HST and CANDELS, van der Wel et al. 2014ApJ...792...L6

  22. (20)Constraining the Low-Mass Slope of the Star Formation Sequence at 0.5<z<2.5, Whitaker et al., 2014ApJ...795..104W

    • Download: Data from Table 2 of Whitaker et al. 2014

  23. (21)A Massive Galaxy in its Core Formation Phase Three Billion Years After the Big Bang, Nelson et al., Nature, 2015, 513, 394N

  24. (22)Star-forming blue ETGs in two newly discovered galaxy overdensities in the HUDF at z=1.84 and 1.9: unveiling the progenitors of passive ETGs in cluster cores, Mei et al., 2015ApJ...804..117M

  25. (23)Discovery of a Strong Lensing Galaxy Embedded in a Cluster at z = 1.62, Wong et al., 2014ApJ...789L..31W

  26. (24)3D-HST+CANDELS: The Evolution of the Galaxy Size-Mass Distribution since z=3, van der Wel et al., 2014ApJ...788...28V

  27. (25)3D-HST WFC3-Selected Catalogs in the Five 3D-HST/CANDELS Fields: Photometry, Photometric Redshifts and Stellar Masses, Skelton, Whitaker, Momcheva, Brammer, van Dokkum et al., arxiv:1403.3689, submitted to ApJS

  28. (26)Bulge Growth and Quenching since z = 2.5 in CANDELS/3D-HST, Lang et al., 2014ApJ...788...11L

  29. (27)Observations of environmental quenching in groups in the 11 Gyr since z=2.5: different quenching for central and satellite galaxies, Tal et al., 2014ApJ...789..164T

  30. (28)Hubble Space Telescope Grism Spectroscopy of Extreme Starbursts across Cosmic Time: The Role of Dwarf Galaxies in the Star Formation History of the Universe, Atek et al., 2014ApJ...789...96A

  31. (29)Exploring the chemical link between local ellipticals and their high-redshift progenitors, Leja et al., 2013ApJ...778L..24L

  32. (30)Confirmation of Small Dynamical and Stellar Masses for Extreme Emission Line Galaxies at z∼2, Maseda et al., 2013ApJ...778L..22M

  33. (31)A CANDELS - 3D-HST Synergy: Resolved Star Formation Patterns at 0.7, Wyuts et al., 2013ApJ...779..135W

  34. (32)Direct measurement of dust attenuation in z∼1.5 star-forming galaxies from 3D-HST: Implications for dust geometry and star formation rates, Price et al., 2014ApJ...788...86P

  35. (33)The Most Luminous z∼9-10 Galaxy Candidates yet Found: The Luminosity Function, Cosmic Star-Formation Rate, and the First Mass Density Estimate at 500 Myr, Oesch et al., 2014ApJ...786..108O

  36. (34)How dead are dead galaxies? Mid-Infrared fluxes of quiescent galaxies at redshift 0.3 < z < 2.5: implications for star formation rates and dust heating, Fumagalli et al., 2014ApJ...796...35F

  37. (35)3D-HST Data Release v3.0: Extremely Deep Spectra in the UDF and WFC3 Mosaics in the 3D-HST/CANDELS Fields, van Dokkum et al., 2013, arXiv:1305.2140

  38. (36)Quiescent Galaxies in the 3D-HST Survey: Spectroscopic Confirmation of a Large Number of Galaxies with Relatively Old Stellar Populations at z∼2, Whitaker et al., 2013ApJ...770L..39W

    • Download: Data from Figure 2 of Whitaker et al. 2013

  39. (37)The Assembly of Milky Way-like Galaxies Since z∼2.5, van Dokkum et al., 2013ApJ...771L..35V

  40. (38)The Structural Evolution of Milky Way-like Star Forming Galaxies since z∼1.3, Patel et al., 2013ApJ...778..115P

  41. (39)A Tentative Detection of an Emission Line at 1.6 m for the z ∼ 12 Candidate UDFj-39546284, Brammer et al., 2013, ApJ...765L..2B

  42. (40)The spatial extent and distribution of star formation in 3D-HST mergers at z∼1.5, Schmidt et al., 2013, MNRAS

  43. (41)The Radial Distribution of Star Formation in Galaxies at z ∼ 1 from the 3D-HST Survey, Nelson et al., 2013, ApJ...763L..16N

  44. (42)Testing Diagnostics of Nuclear Activity and Star Formation in Galaxies at z > 1, Trump et al., 2013ApJ...763L...6T

  45. (43)Large Scale Star-Formation Driven Outflows at 1<z<2 in the 3D-HST, Lundgren et al., 2012, ApJ...760..49L

  46. (44)3D-HST Grism Spectroscopy of a Gravitationally Lensed, Low-metallicity Starburst Galaxy at z=1.847, Brammer et al., 2012, ApJ...758L..17B

  47. (45)H-alpha Equivalent Widths from the 3D-HST survey: evolution with redshift and dependence on stellar mass, Fumagalli et al., 2012, ApJ...757L..22F

  48. (46)3D-HST: A Wide-Field Grism Spectroscopic Survey with the Hubble Space Telescope, Brammer et al., 2012, ApJS...200..13B

  49. (47)Spatially Resolved H Maps and Sizes of 57 Strongly Star-forming Galaxies at z∼1 from 3D-HST: Evidence for Rapid Inside-out Assembly of Disk Galaxies, Nelson et al., 2012, ApJ...747L..28N

  50. (48)A CANDELS WFC3 Grism Study of Emission-line Galaxies at z ∼ 2: A Mix of Nuclear Activity and Low-metallicity Star Formation, Trump et al., 2011, ApJ...743..144T

  51. (49)First Results from the 3D-HST survey: the Striking Diversity of Massive Galaxies at z>1, van Dokkum et al., 2011, ApJ, 743L, 15

Scientific Collaborations

  1. (1)The MOSDEF Survey: AGN Multi-wavelength Identification, Selection Biases, and Host Galaxy Properties, Azadi et al., 2017ApJ...835...27A

  2. (2)KMOS3D: Dynamical Constraints on the Mass Budget in Early Star-forming Disks, Wyuts et al., 2016ApJ...831..149W

  3. (3)The Evolution of Metallicity and Metallicity Gradients from z = 2.7 to 0.6 with KMOS3D, Wyuts et al., 2016ApJ...827...74W

  4. (4)The Angular Momentum Distribution and Baryon Content of Star-forming Galaxies at z~1-3, Burkert et al., 2016ApJ...826..214B

  5. (5)The MOSDEF Survey: Electron Density and Ionization Parameter at z ~ 2.3, Sanders et al., 2016ApJ...816...23S

  6. (6)The MOSDEF Survey: Metallicity Dependence of the PAH Emission at High Redshift and Implications for 24 micron-inferred IR Luminosities and Star Formation Rates at z~2, Shivaei et al., arXiv:1609.04814

  7. (7)The MOSDEF Survey: Detection of [O III]λ4363 and the Direct-method Oxygen Abundance of a Star-forming Galaxy at z = 3.08, Sanders et al., 2016ApJ...825L...23S

  8. (8)The MOSDEF Survey: The Strong Agreement between Hα and UV-to-FIR Star Formation Rates for z ~ 2 Star-forming Galaxies, Shivaei et al., 2016ApJ...820L...23S

  9. (9)TThe MOSDEF Survey: Dynamical and Baryonic Masses and Kinematic Structures of Star-forming Galaxies at 1.4 ≤ z ≤ 2.6, Price et al., 2016ApJ...819...80P

  10. (10)The MOSFIRE Deep Evolution Field (MOSDEF) Survey: Rest-frame Optical Spectroscopy for ~1500 H-selected Galaxies at 1.37<z<3.8, Kriek et al., 2015ApJS..218...15K

  11. (11)The MOSDEF Survey: Dissecting the star-formation rate vs. stellar mass relation using H$\alpha$ and H$\beta$ emission lines at z∼2, Shivaei et al., 2015ApJ...804L...4M

  12. (12)The MOSDEF Survey: Measurements of Balmer Decrements and the Dust Attenuation Curve at Redshifts z∼1.4--2.6, Reddy et al., 2015ApJ...806..259R

  13. (13)First Results from the VIRIAL Survey: The Stellar Content of UVJ-selected Quiescent Galaxies at 1.5<z<2 from KMOS, Mendel et al., 2015ApJ...804L...4M

  14. (14)The KMOS3D Survey: Design, First Results, and the Evolution of Galaxy Kinematics from 0.7<z<2.7, Wasnioski et al., 2015ApJ...799..209W

  15. (15)The MOSDEF Survey: Excitation Properties of z∼2.3 Star-forming Galaxies, Shapley et al., 2014, 2015ApJ...801...88S

  16. (16)The MOSDEF Survey: Optical AGN Diagnostics at z∼2.3, Coil et al., 2014, 2015ApJ...801...35C

  17. (17)The MOSDEF Survey: Mass, Metallicity, and Star-formation Rate at z∼2.3, Sanders et al., 2014, 2015ApJ...799..138S

  18. (18)A Consistent Study of Metallicity Evolution at 0.8 < z < 2.6, Wuyts et al., 2014ApJ...789L..40W

  19. (19)Evidence for Wide-Spread AGN Driven Outflows in the Most Massive z∼1-2 Star Forming Galaxies, Genzel et al., 2014, 2014ApJ...796....7G

Press Releases

  1. Sky & Telescope summary of the 3D-HST AAS Special Session in January 2015:  “Hubble’s Long Look at Distant Galaxies”.

  2. NASA, ESA, Yale and Keck press releases based on "A Massive Galaxy in its Core Formation Phase Three Billion Years After the Big Bang, Nelson et al., 2014, Nature, 10.1038/nature13616.

  3. NASA and Yale press releases based on Wong et al. (2014):  “Hubble Shows Farthest Lensing Galaxy Yields Clues to Early Universe”.

  4. NASA and Yale press releases based on van Dokkum et al. (2013) and Patel et al. (2013):  “Hubble Reveals First Pictures of Milky Way’s Formative Years”. Also on NBS News, Huffington Post, Space.com and Slate.